![]() foreign policy and where staff morale is at rock bottom,” he added. ![]() “But the biggest question is whether Pompeo, whose loyalty has endeared him to the president, will stand up to Trump,” Patrick said, “when the latter threatens to create diplomatic chaos or recklessly ignores threats to the United States.” “Mike Pompeo inherits a State Department that has been marginalized in the conduct of U.S. Mike Pompeo, director of the CIA and former Kansas congressman, could have “one advantage Tillerson lacked: the president’s ear,” Patrick said.“Director Pompeo is intelligent and strategic, asks the right questions, and doesn’t have his own agenda as Secretary Tillerson did,” Weinstein said. The big losers are North Korea, Iran, China and Qatar,” said Kenneth Weinstein, president and CEO of the Hudson Institute. Who wins and who loses with Tillerson out? Internationally, “the big winners are Japan, Israel, the UAE, and Saudi. “In a less dysfunctional administration he might have had the opportunity put those skills and instincts to better use.” Yet some feel Tillerson was underrated with “much better diplomatic skills and instincts than most Washingtonians gave him credit for,” Maloney said. Ultimately, “the absence of allies and influence eroded any prospect of impact or longevity.” In politics, “favorable press can make or break a reputation,” Suzanne Maloney, deputy director of the Brooking Institution’s Foreign Policy program, wrote in an email. Tillerson’s “allergy to media engagement may have been a valuable survival skill for an energy company CEO” but not for a government leader. Tillerson “was virtually invisible, when a secretary of state needs to speak out and articulate American foreign policy.” He failed to fill senior appointments, “leaving multiple departmental bureaus without an assistant secretary of state a year into his tenure.”.He restructured the bureau, “a useless and time-consuming distraction that diverted attention and resources away from actually handling the world’s most pressing challenges.”.Tillerson concentrated policy deliberations and decision-making among a group of small advisers, “rather than delegating responsibility for policy formulation to knowledgeable officials in the relevant regional and functional bureaus.”.Tillerson never quite made the transition from corporate CEO to government leader, and “undermined himself by making several grievous managerial mistakes,” Stewart Patrick, a senior fellow and director of the International Institutions and Global Governance Program at the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in an email to the PBS NewsHour. The PBS NewsHour’s Daniel Bush outlines some of those disagreements here. Tillerson and Trump couldn’t see eye-to-eye on a number of issues, including the Iran Nuclear Deal. “He was virtually invisible, when a secretary of state needs to speak out and articulate American foreign policy. He served, to some degree, as an enabler of Donald Trump’s efforts to reduce and cut State in the budget,” Miller said. … but Tillerson also “played a bad hand badly.” “Redesign at the State Department made him appear to be a CEO and not a terribly adept one. “Not only did Trump not empower Tillerson, he disempowered him.” Nikki Haley was basically talking about everything that a secretary of state would have talked about.” Gary Cohn got what remained of climate change. “He disempowered him by allowing a thousand flowers to bloom: Jared Kushner became the point person on the Arab-Israeli issue. “And not only did Trump not empower him, he disempowered him,” Miller added. Miller said that Tillerson was doomed to fail because he was never empowered by Trump. Tillerson didn’t have “any chance of succeeding despite all of his deficits and liabilities,” said Aaron David Miller, a vice president at the Wilson Center and a former State Department adviser to both Republican and Democratic secretaries of state. We asked experts what they thought about Tillerson and his tenure, the State Department he leaves behind and the challenges that face CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who Trump nominated to fill the position. prepares for historic talks between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, an effort Tillerson said in departing remarks that he had helped lead. His tenure was one of the shortest in the agency’s history, as detailed by The Washington Post here.ĭuring Tillerson’s time in office, 60 percent of the State Departments’ top-ranking career diplomats left the agency, and new applications to join the foreign service fell by half, according to data from the American Foreign Service Association. Tillerson, the former CEO of ExxonMobil, served just more than 13 months as secretary of state. With one tweet, President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that Rex Tillerson would no longer lead the State Department.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |